<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Types of Libertarian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.waliberals.net/types-of-libertarian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.waliberals.net/types-of-libertarian/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:33:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fintan</title>
		<link>http://www.waliberals.net/types-of-libertarian/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Fintan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 19:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.waliberals.net/?p=96#comment-222</guid>
		<description>1) Anarcho-capitalists oppose corporations. Corporations are created by the state and have charters entailing certain legal requirements.

2) Classical liberals are not libertarians. &quot;Libertarian&quot; was a synonym for anarchist up until fairly recently. Even using the contemporary American definition of &quot;libertarian&quot;, not all classical liberals would necessarily fit the bill e.g. Thomas Paine.

3) Minarchists are essentially quite radical classical liberals.

4) Neolibertarians aren&#039;t libertarians at all, by your definition of them. They are neoconservatives with a strong economic liberal streak.

5) Objectivism isn&#039;t libertarian.

6) Paleolibertarianism is sometimes, but not always, libertarian. It is more in the tradition of Edmund Burke and Ron Paul than Tucker, Spooner, Rothbard et cetera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Anarcho-capitalists oppose corporations. Corporations are created by the state and have charters entailing certain legal requirements.</p>
<p>2) Classical liberals are not libertarians. &#8220;Libertarian&#8221; was a synonym for anarchist up until fairly recently. Even using the contemporary American definition of &#8220;libertarian&#8221;, not all classical liberals would necessarily fit the bill e.g. Thomas Paine.</p>
<p>3) Minarchists are essentially quite radical classical liberals.</p>
<p>4) Neolibertarians aren&#8217;t libertarians at all, by your definition of them. They are neoconservatives with a strong economic liberal streak.</p>
<p>5) Objectivism isn&#8217;t libertarian.</p>
<p>6) Paleolibertarianism is sometimes, but not always, libertarian. It is more in the tradition of Edmund Burke and Ron Paul than Tucker, Spooner, Rothbard et cetera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
